<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: thy kingdom come, thy will be done, as long as it keeps republicans in control of the house and senate</title>
	<link>http://www.steeplesandpeople.com/blog/2006/06/09/thy-kingdom-come-thy-will-be-done-as-long-as-it-keeps-republicans-in-control-of-the-house-and-senate/</link>
	<description>when faith like a child isn't enough</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.steeplesandpeople.com/blog/2006/06/09/thy-kingdom-come-thy-will-be-done-as-long-as-it-keeps-republicans-in-control-of-the-house-and-senate/#comment-210</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 23:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.steeplesandpeople.com/blog/2006/06/09/thy-kingdom-come-thy-will-be-done-as-long-as-it-keeps-republicans-in-control-of-the-house-and-senate/#comment-210</guid>
					<description>Quasi even.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quasi even.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.steeplesandpeople.com/blog/2006/06/09/thy-kingdom-come-thy-will-be-done-as-long-as-it-keeps-republicans-in-control-of-the-house-and-senate/#comment-209</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 23:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.steeplesandpeople.com/blog/2006/06/09/thy-kingdom-come-thy-will-be-done-as-long-as-it-keeps-republicans-in-control-of-the-house-and-senate/#comment-209</guid>
					<description>I agree with most of what you're saying. But I'd quibble with the idea that the colonies were established for religious freedom. Quite a few of the original colonies &lt;i&gt;were&lt;/i&gt; quas-theocracies. 

Regarding divorce, I think Jon Stewart said it well on &lt;i&gt;The Daily Show&lt;/i&gt; the other night when he was talking to Bill Bennett about gay marriage:  &quot;Divorce is not caused because 50% of marriages end in gayness.&quot; (If you haven't seen the entire bit, it's worth watching and is up &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44y6jCVSrvk&amp;#38;search=bennett%2Bstewart&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with most of what you&#8217;re saying. But I&#8217;d quibble with the idea that the colonies were established for religious freedom. Quite a few of the original colonies <i>were</i> quas-theocracies. </p>
<p>Regarding divorce, I think Jon Stewart said it well on <i>The Daily Show</i> the other night when he was talking to Bill Bennett about gay marriage:  &#8220;Divorce is not caused because 50% of marriages end in gayness.&#8221; (If you haven&#8217;t seen the entire bit, it&#8217;s worth watching and is up <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44y6jCVSrvk&amp;search=bennett%2Bstewart" rel="nofollow">here</a>.)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Allison</title>
		<link>http://www.steeplesandpeople.com/blog/2006/06/09/thy-kingdom-come-thy-will-be-done-as-long-as-it-keeps-republicans-in-control-of-the-house-and-senate/#comment-207</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 15:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.steeplesandpeople.com/blog/2006/06/09/thy-kingdom-come-thy-will-be-done-as-long-as-it-keeps-republicans-in-control-of-the-house-and-senate/#comment-207</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On another tack, if Dorsey and Co. want to really build bridges and promote healing between the Christian and queer communities, they need to actually build relationships with people in the queer community, not just hand out presents in a display of largesse at Pride.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Absolutely.  The church I attend (when I go...notice it's Sunday morning, and I'm reading blogs instead!) is open to people of all persuasions, but it's a rarity, especially here in fundie-crazy Colorado Springs.  But, our Pridefest parade is comingup, and I believe some of our (straight) members are actually marching in support.

As much as I question my own beliefs, and as specifically-defined as the title &quot;Christian&quot; is these days (to the general public), I'm often tempted to ditch the term altogether.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On another tack, if Dorsey and Co. want to really build bridges and promote healing between the Christian and queer communities, they need to actually build relationships with people in the queer community, not just hand out presents in a display of largesse at Pride.</p></blockquote>
<p>Absolutely.  The church I attend (when I go&#8230;notice it&#8217;s Sunday morning, and I&#8217;m reading blogs instead!) is open to people of all persuasions, but it&#8217;s a rarity, especially here in fundie-crazy Colorado Springs.  But, our Pridefest parade is comingup, and I believe some of our (straight) members are actually marching in support.</p>
<p>As much as I question my own beliefs, and as specifically-defined as the title &#8220;Christian&#8221; is these days (to the general public), I&#8217;m often tempted to ditch the term altogether.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: eddie(F)</title>
		<link>http://www.steeplesandpeople.com/blog/2006/06/09/thy-kingdom-come-thy-will-be-done-as-long-as-it-keeps-republicans-in-control-of-the-house-and-senate/#comment-206</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 08:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.steeplesandpeople.com/blog/2006/06/09/thy-kingdom-come-thy-will-be-done-as-long-as-it-keeps-republicans-in-control-of-the-house-and-senate/#comment-206</guid>
					<description>Just to be clear:  I have nothing against Dorsey, and I hold no grudges against what he feels in his heart he needs to do, or why he deleted my comments.  His “act” was merely a catalyst to speak my mind.  I cannot, and WILL not judge what is in his heart - so let's call the $5 Starbuck gift card merely a springboard for me to say what I needed to say.  A “marketing gimmick” if you would.  If that is OK with everyone else.
;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to be clear:  I have nothing against Dorsey, and I hold no grudges against what he feels in his heart he needs to do, or why he deleted my comments.  His “act” was merely a catalyst to speak my mind.  I cannot, and WILL not judge what is in his heart - so let&#8217;s call the $5 Starbuck gift card merely a springboard for me to say what I needed to say.  A “marketing gimmick” if you would.  If that is OK with everyone else.<br />
;-)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: shelly</title>
		<link>http://www.steeplesandpeople.com/blog/2006/06/09/thy-kingdom-come-thy-will-be-done-as-long-as-it-keeps-republicans-in-control-of-the-house-and-senate/#comment-205</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 02:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.steeplesandpeople.com/blog/2006/06/09/thy-kingdom-come-thy-will-be-done-as-long-as-it-keeps-republicans-in-control-of-the-house-and-senate/#comment-205</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;It’s been said many times and many ways, but I’ll say it again: if Dominionist Christians are so concerned with legislating marriage according to Biblical principles, why aren’t they trying to outlaw divorce?&lt;/i&gt;

EXACTLY! Divorce has done more to rip &quot;traditional&quot; marriage a new one than letting homosexuals marry ever will.

I've seen some of what this stuff can do. I know someone who was kicked out of my church because the board found out he was gay, and he refused to &quot;go straight&quot;. His family has been pissed off about it ever since. Oddly enough, my pastor has a gay brother. Kinda sucks to think about it, really. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It’s been said many times and many ways, but I’ll say it again: if Dominionist Christians are so concerned with legislating marriage according to Biblical principles, why aren’t they trying to outlaw divorce?</i></p>
<p>EXACTLY! Divorce has done more to rip &#8220;traditional&#8221; marriage a new one than letting homosexuals marry ever will.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen some of what this stuff can do. I know someone who was kicked out of my church because the board found out he was gay, and he refused to &#8220;go straight&#8221;. His family has been pissed off about it ever since. Oddly enough, my pastor has a gay brother. Kinda sucks to think about it, really. <img src='http://www.steeplesandpeople.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://www.steeplesandpeople.com/blog/2006/06/09/thy-kingdom-come-thy-will-be-done-as-long-as-it-keeps-republicans-in-control-of-the-house-and-senate/#comment-203</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 16:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.steeplesandpeople.com/blog/2006/06/09/thy-kingdom-come-thy-will-be-done-as-long-as-it-keeps-republicans-in-control-of-the-house-and-senate/#comment-203</guid>
					<description>Oh, thanks for that background. I didn't realize that -- it's probably in the comments somewhere but I didn't read those really carefully as it basically got into a tax discussion. Not that I don't like discussing taxes, but I wasn't really in the mood for it at the time.

I think you're right, that Eddie's being a little unfair if he's singling out Dorsey in this particular case because we know that Dorsey opposes Bush's policies and the policies of likeminded dominionists. But, at the same time, he has a point in general. I feel this frustration with well-meaning evangelicals who say, &quot;You might be gay but I'm going to love you anyway!&quot; People like me say, &quot;There IS no 'anyway'!&quot; I want evangelicals to directly confront the ugliness of the teachings of their religion on this particular issue. It's not enough to say, &quot;Our religion has been cruel to you, I'm sorry.&quot; I want them to genuinely work toward moving past the fearmongering and indoctrination that Christianity has surrounding issues of sexuality. 

Now, I know some folks would rebut me here, saying &quot;Yeah, you just want people to believe the same thing you do.&quot; Which is true, of course. And unrealistic.

I guess I'm just sick of Christians saying, &quot;I love you in Christ, but you're a sinner,&quot; when a person &lt;i&gt;cannot help&lt;/i&gt; being a sinner, and the Bible has been mistranslated to make it say that they're sinners. 

On another tack, if Dorsey and Co. want to really build bridges and promote healing between the Christian and queer communities, they need to actually build relationships with people in the queer community, not just hand out presents in a display of largesse at Pride. In my experience, most Christians don't have gay friends, and if they do, it's just a token one here or there. (There are always exceptions, of course, including, of course, gay Christians themselves!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, thanks for that background. I didn&#8217;t realize that &#8212; it&#8217;s probably in the comments somewhere but I didn&#8217;t read those really carefully as it basically got into a tax discussion. Not that I don&#8217;t like discussing taxes, but I wasn&#8217;t really in the mood for it at the time.</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re right, that Eddie&#8217;s being a little unfair if he&#8217;s singling out Dorsey in this particular case because we know that Dorsey opposes Bush&#8217;s policies and the policies of likeminded dominionists. But, at the same time, he has a point in general. I feel this frustration with well-meaning evangelicals who say, &#8220;You might be gay but I&#8217;m going to love you anyway!&#8221; People like me say, &#8220;There IS no &#8216;anyway&#8217;!&#8221; I want evangelicals to directly confront the ugliness of the teachings of their religion on this particular issue. It&#8217;s not enough to say, &#8220;Our religion has been cruel to you, I&#8217;m sorry.&#8221; I want them to genuinely work toward moving past the fearmongering and indoctrination that Christianity has surrounding issues of sexuality. </p>
<p>Now, I know some folks would rebut me here, saying &#8220;Yeah, you just want people to believe the same thing you do.&#8221; Which is true, of course. And unrealistic.</p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;m just sick of Christians saying, &#8220;I love you in Christ, but you&#8217;re a sinner,&#8221; when a person <i>cannot help</i> being a sinner, and the Bible has been mistranslated to make it say that they&#8217;re sinners. </p>
<p>On another tack, if Dorsey and Co. want to really build bridges and promote healing between the Christian and queer communities, they need to actually build relationships with people in the queer community, not just hand out presents in a display of largesse at Pride. In my experience, most Christians don&#8217;t have gay friends, and if they do, it&#8217;s just a token one here or there. (There are always exceptions, of course, including, of course, gay Christians themselves!)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Allison</title>
		<link>http://www.steeplesandpeople.com/blog/2006/06/09/thy-kingdom-come-thy-will-be-done-as-long-as-it-keeps-republicans-in-control-of-the-house-and-senate/#comment-202</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 15:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.steeplesandpeople.com/blog/2006/06/09/thy-kingdom-come-thy-will-be-done-as-long-as-it-keeps-republicans-in-control-of-the-house-and-senate/#comment-202</guid>
					<description>If I'm not mistaken, Eddie(f) is largely referring to a post over at Dorsey's place &lt;a href=&quot;http://notmywill.blogspot.com/2006/05/hot-cup-of-coffee-in-my-name.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  In the comments of this post, some shit-throwing ensued, and Dorsey proceded to delete many of the comments.

Just a little background...

Anyway, assuming that these are the folks to whom Eddie refers, this statement:

&lt;blockquote&gt;...many of the same people giving out these cards are the ones supporting Bush to pass this amendment.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

is rather disingenuous.  The folks -- at least the ones I'm aware of -- who are passing out these cards do so pretty much in &lt;b&gt;apology&lt;/b&gt; for BushCo's policies, not in support of them.  I certainly wouldn't have supported this effort otherwise, at least -- I'm in favor of allowing gay marriage nationwide.  Or, as Eddie so rightly put it:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Married gay people are no threat to any religious person from any faith in this country, or any other for that matter. There is no practical, logical or legal reason to prevent them from enjoying the same benefits from marriage that heterosexual couples enjoy.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I&#8217;m not mistaken, Eddie(f) is largely referring to a post over at Dorsey&#8217;s place <a href="http://notmywill.blogspot.com/2006/05/hot-cup-of-coffee-in-my-name.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.  In the comments of this post, some shit-throwing ensued, and Dorsey proceded to delete many of the comments.</p>
<p>Just a little background&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway, assuming that these are the folks to whom Eddie refers, this statement:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;many of the same people giving out these cards are the ones supporting Bush to pass this amendment.</p></blockquote>
<p>is rather disingenuous.  The folks &#8212; at least the ones I&#8217;m aware of &#8212; who are passing out these cards do so pretty much in <b>apology</b> for BushCo&#8217;s policies, not in support of them.  I certainly wouldn&#8217;t have supported this effort otherwise, at least &#8212; I&#8217;m in favor of allowing gay marriage nationwide.  Or, as Eddie so rightly put it:</p>
<blockquote><p>Married gay people are no threat to any religious person from any faith in this country, or any other for that matter. There is no practical, logical or legal reason to prevent them from enjoying the same benefits from marriage that heterosexual couples enjoy.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
